David Josephs reviews arguments for Oswald having "planned" the shooting and finds them both contradictory and without rational foundation.

Bob Groden has been a true champion of the case for the public. He has devoted much of his adult life trying to show that the Warren Commission was nothing but a sham meant to conceal the true facts of Kennedy's death. His current book is a decidedly mixed bag of virtues and liabilities. But taken as a trilogy, his last three books form what is the best photo library available in book form on this case, writes Jim DiEugenio.

Arnaldo Fernandez takes a (skeptical) look at the Herminio Diaz story.

Sherry Fiester [uses] established science-based protocols to determine events and causalities, not to search for manufactured support of an a priori conclusion, write LeBlanc and Dragoo.

Joseph Green and Jim DiEugenio look at Barry Ernst's account of his personal quest to find Victoria Adams, a key witness in the Texas School Book Depository on November 22, 1963.

A valiant book that sometimes stumbles and falls short of its proclaimed goal ... On the other hand, the author does a skillful job on several core topics, writes Dr. David Mantik.

You won't hear about the ARRB on The Lost JFK Tapes either. But at least you won't have to suffer through the god-awful Dale Myers type manipulation of fact that produces an unsupportable conclusion, writes Jim DiEugenio.

Jim DiEugenio lists the low quality of the government witnesses in the JFK assassination case.

Jim DiEugenio reports on his research into the Rose Cheramie story.

One thing seems certain: what did the majority of witnesses hear when Connally was shot? Nothing, writes Milicent Cranor.