Mustafa Hassan's side of the Malcolm X case was unveiled in a recent press conference led by renowned attorney Ben Crump. It is interwoven with the turbulent history of the civil rights movement in the United States.
His account provides a fresh perspective on the tragic assassination of Malcolm X in 1965 and the subsequent investigations. Explore our website to learn more.
But who is Mustafa Hassan, and why is his voice significant in this historical context?
The Man Behind the Witness Stand
Mustafa Hassan's journey begins within the heart of a transformative era in American history—the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Born during societal upheaval, Hassan actively engaged in the struggle for racial justice, becoming a member of the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU), an organization founded by Malcolm X.
Hassan's involvement with the OAAU positioned him on the frontlines of change, where he ensured the safety and security of those advocating for civil rights. Little did he know that his commitment to this cause would lead him to become an eyewitness to one of the most tragic and iconic moments in American history: The Malcolm X assassinationalcolm X assassination.
The Long Silence
Mustafa Hassan's account of the Malcolm X case remained shrouded in mystery for decades. He witnessed the chaos that erupted at the Audubon Ballroom, where Malcolm X was gunned down.
Hassan's actions were marked by courage and conviction in the following days. He intervened, subduing a key suspect, and later found himself at the center of a perplexing scene involving police and the alleged assassin.
What is most striking about Hassan's story is that, despite the pivotal role he played and the valuable information he possessed, he was never questioned or interviewed during the ongoing Malcolm X case.
Confirming What We Long Suspected
The recent press conference led by Ben Crump marked a turning point in Hassan's life and the broader pursuit of justice.
Hassan finally broke his silence, sharing his vivid recollections of that tragic day. His account, supported by archival photos and video footage, shed light on the events in the Audubon Ballroom.
Hassan's revelations resonate deeply, not only for the historical significance of the Malcolm X case but also for the broader discourse on civil rights, accountability, and the pursuit of truth.
Advocate for the Truth with Kennedys and King
Hassan’s voice, once silenced by time, now resounds as a call for truth and justice, urging us to confront the past and ensure that history is recorded and understood. Join hands with Kennedys and King in this endeavor.
Since the JFK Records Act reached its October 2017 deadline, the Trump and Biden Administrations have been hit with widespread criticism and, in President Biden’s case, a lawsuit for postponing the release of several important documents regarding the John F. Kennedy assassination.
While the law allows exemptions, it outlines when they are allowed and puts the burden of proof on agencies. For more on these exemptions, read our full blog here.
Let’s explore the postponement and why it’s against the law, shall we?
It Happened One Friday
In the late hours of Friday, June 30, 2023, long after Washington DC's media elite had filed their reports and well after dedicated pundits had departed for their July 4th celebrations in the Hamptons, the Biden Administration issued an Executive Memorandum.
This move has been widely criticized as an illegitimate attempt to terminate the JFK Records Act and seize control over legislative processes and records, hurting the very spirit of this Congressional Act.
The JFK Records Act: A Background
The JFK Records Collection Act of 1992 was enacted to promote transparency and public access to government records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Its primary purpose was to require federal agencies, particularly those involved in the investigation of the assassination, to disclose and make available to the public all records and documents related to this historic event.
By passing this Act, the government aimed to provide a comprehensive and unclassified record of the Kennedy assassination, thereby enhancing public understanding of the event and addressing various conspiracy theories and uncertainties that had arisen over the years.
This legislation was instrumental in ensuring that civilians had access to a significant historical record and could scrutinize the details surrounding President Kennedy's tragic death. It also reflected a commitment to openness in government and the principle that certain historical records should be made accessible to the public after a specific period.
Why is the JFK Records Act Postponement Illegal?
Below are some reasons the incessant postponement is against the law.
The Act mandated the public release of JFK assassination-related records by October 26, 2017, unless stringent postponement criteria were met—they were not, hence the lawsuit against President Biden.
A postponement necessitated clear and convincing evidence, with the President required to provide unclassified explanations for each delayed record.
The President's postponement authority extended solely to Executive Branch records, excluding legislative branch records.
Each record had to be accompanied by an Identification Aid detailing its particulars and the legal grounds for postponement.
The National Archivist's role involved maintaining transparency through the upkeep of Identification Aids and a publicly accessible directory.
A "presumption of disclosure" was established, shifting the burden to agencies to demonstrate the necessity of postponement.
The Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) oversaw compliance, releasing records unless they strictly met the postponement criteria outlined in the Act.
Discover more about the illegitimate nature of this postponement at Kennedys and King. We keep an eye on and call out each indiscretion of intelligence agencies and the government’s executive and administrative branches regarding the JFK assassination and other political assassinations of the 1960s.
Camp Peary, or "The Farm," is a name whispered in the shadows. Ensconced in the woods of Virginia, this covert training facility has played a pivotal role in the history of American espionage. But many may not know its intriguing connection to the former director of the CIA, Allen Dulles, and the enigmatic JFK assassination. Check out our blog for the details.
Stick around for a brief exploration of Allen Dulles’s whereabouts on the assassination weekend.
The Purpose of Camp Peary
“Camp Peary,” "The Farm," and "The Country Club" are all names used for a sprawling 9,000-acre property located near Williamsburg, Virginia.
It is a highly secretive and secure US military reservation established during World War II that started as grounds for covert intelligence training, including espionage, sabotage, and other covert operations.
The Allen Dulles and Camp Peary Connection
Robert Morrow, a dedicated assassination of John F. Kennedy researcher, recently made a significant discovery in the Dulles Archives at the Princeton Library. David Talbot discusses this discovery in his Allen Dulles biography, The Devil's Chessboard. Unfortunately, it had been lost during a Dulles files reorganization, which disrupted its reference pages.
However, Morrow requested assistance from the archivists to recover this vital information, and they found it within a complex digital file. This finding reinforces the claim made in an invaluable day-by-day calendar datebook.
The datebook indicates that Dulles was in Washington that day but did not spend the late afternoon or evening at his Georgetown home. Instead, he was at Camp Peary.
The datebook records Dulles's presence there from late Friday afternoon through the assassination weekend and the following events: The autopsy, Lee Harvey Oswald's detention, and the latter’s assassination.
The JFK Assassination and Allen Dulles Connection
After being relieved of his CIA duties by President Kennedy in 1961, Dulles remained deeply connected to intelligence networks.
Following his dismissal by President Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs, Dulles held regular meetings with high-ranking CIA officials. He also had encounters with a prominent Cuban exile leader, Paulino Sierra Martinez, as noted by Talbot in his book.
In the spring of 1963, Martinez met Dulles and General Lucius D. Clay, who had clashed with Kennedy over issues like the Bay of Pigs and the Berlin Crisis.
Martinez operated mainly from Chicago, a city linked to the infamous Chicago Plot to assassinate JFK. Homer Echeverria claimed his group would receive funds once they dealt with Kennedy. According to Secret Service sources, Echeverria's weapon purchases were reportedly financed by Martinez with alleged mob funds.
It doesn’t bode well for a CIA director who was relieved of his duties to meet with people tied to a different JFK assassination attempt.
Explore These Lines of Inquiry at Kennedys and King
Camp Peary, Allen Dulles, and their alleged connection to the JFK assassination is a tale shrouded in mystery, intrigue, and controversy.
Explore this and other credible theories further at Kennedys and King, a platform dedicated to finding the truth behind the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King.
The assassination of John F. Kennedy remains one of the most enduring mysteries in American history. In the subsequent decades, various investigations, conspiracy theories, public demand for transparency, and our collective endeavors resulted in the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act.
The JFK Records Collection Act was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on October 26, 1992. It mandated the release of all government records related to the assassination of President Kennedy classified by federal agencies.
It set a deadline for disclosure, requiring all records to be made public no later than 25 years after its enactment, which was October 26, 2017. It’s worth noting that the most recent JFK documents were released earlier this year, jumping the deadline by almost six years.
Establishment of the Assassination Records Review Board
The JFK Records Collection Act established the Assassination Records Review Board, or ARRB. It is an independent agency overseeing the review and release of assassination records.
The ARRB's mission is to ensure maximum public disclosure of documents related to the assassination. It is also responsible for identifying and securing records that might not have been previously disclosed or redacted in previous disclosures.
The Exemptions
While the JFK Records Collection Act aimed for transparency, it did provide for some exceptions. Records could be withheld if their release would harm national security, foreign relations, law enforcement, intelligence sources and methods, or any identifiable individuals' privacy.
While these exemptions were expected to be used sparingly and proven beyond a reasonable doubt by an agency, they have been abused by the powers that be to conceal the truth behind JFK assassination.
Public and Congressional Access
Lastly, and most importantly, the Act allowed the public and congressional committees to access the disclosed records, providing a mechanism for independent examination and scrutiny of the documents.
The Impact and Importance of the JFK Records Collection Act
The JFK Records Collection Act has profoundly impacted the public's understanding of the assassination and the government's handling of related records. By setting a clear framework for releasing documents and creating an independent oversight body, it aims to address suspicions of cover-ups and conspiracy.
Unfortunately, if this Act of Congress can be denied, it can also be abolished, as evidenced by President Biden’s Executive Memorandum that all but wrote it off entirely. We need your support now more than ever to push for the truth behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
The assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains one of the most enduring mysteries in American history. In the subsequent decades, various investigations, conspiracy theories, public demand for transparency, and our collective endeavors resulted in the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act.
The JFK Records Collection Act was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on October 26, 1992. It mandated the release of all government records related to the assassination of President Kennedy classified by federal agencies.
It set a deadline for disclosure, requiring all records to be made public no later than 25 years after its enactment, which was October 26, 2017. It’s worth noting that the most recent JFK documents were released earlier this year, jumping the deadline by almost six years.
Establishment of the Assassination Records Review Board
The JFK Records Collection Act established the Assassination Records Review Board, or ARRB. It is an independent agency overseeing the review and release of assassination records.
The ARRB's mission is to ensure maximum public disclosure of documents related to the assassination. It is also responsible for identifying and securing records that might not have been previously disclosed or redacted in previous disclosures.
Image Filename: JFK-with-Kurt-Debus
Image Alt Text: President John F. Kennedy Standing Alongside Center Director Kurt Debus
The Exemptions
While the JFK Records Collection Act aimed for transparency, it did provide for some exceptions. Records could be withheld if their release would harm national security, foreign relations, law enforcement, intelligence sources and methods, or any identifiable individuals' privacy.
While these exemptions were expected to be used sparingly and proven beyond a reasonable doubt by an agency, they have been abused by the powers that be to conceal the truth behind the JFK assassination.
Public and Congressional Access
Lastly, and most importantly, the Act allowed the public and congressional committees to access the disclosed records, providing a mechanism for independent examination and scrutiny of the documents.
The Impact and Importance of the JFK Records Collection Act
The JFK Records Collection Act has profoundly impacted the public's understanding of the assassination and the government's handling of related records. By setting a clear framework for releasing documents and creating an independent oversight body, it aims to address suspicions of cover-ups and conspiracy.
Unfortunately, if this Act of Congress can be denied, it can also be abolished, as evidenced by President Biden’s Executive Memorandum that all but wrote it off entirely. We need your support now more than ever to push for the truth behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
The Sixth Floor Museum Treatment of Witness Testimony
The Dallas museum acknowledges witnesses' accounts of gunfire from the grassy knoll, smoke seen, and suspicious activity near the rail yards.
However, it fails to mention fresh cigarette butts and footprints where the smoke was reported. Lee Bowers' flash of light and an unusual shape in the Moorman photo strengthen the case for an unidentified presence at the scene.
These overlooked clues shed new light on the JFK assassination.
The Contradictions from the Photographic Evidence
The Sixth Floor Museum also states that "the easternmost window on the south wall was half open," though photographic evidence indicates that the window was merely a quarter open.
Additionally, the mention of a paper bag in the far east corner, supposedly used to transport the rifle, belies the absence of this bag in crime scene photos. Moreover, examining the Warren Commission's subchapter, "The Long and Bulky Package," reveals substantial doubts regarding the feasibility of a rifle fitting inside Oswald's bag.
The museum asserts that Lee Harvey Oswald's fingerprints and palm prints were discovered on numerous cartons and a paper bag. However, referencing Chapter 4 of the Warren Report, it becomes evident that the Commission itself admitted that the key box at the window, used as a gun rest, and the adjacent box contained no prints attributable to Oswald.
Significantly, Oswald's prints were found on one box and another nearby. This, however, should be considered, given that Oswald was employed in the building, and the Commission acknowledged the possibility that he had handled these cartons as part of his routine duties.
Furthermore, only one of these prints was less than three days old, with the Commission acknowledging that it could have been placed on the carton at any time during this period. Consequently, they concluded that the prints do not definitively establish the exact time Oswald was present.
Read the Blog for More Insights About the Sixth Floor Museum
The Sixth Floor Museum is a harmful exhibit, for most of the tidbits it perpetuates are factoids and have been debunked by photographic evidence and the Warren Commission results. Read the complete blog for a thorough analysis, and follow us to keep tabs on new developments in the JFK assassination.
