Spy messages could finally solve mystery of UN chief’s death crash

by Jamie Doward, At: The Guardian

This book is really an entry level book for the novice, an overview of the assassination that tries to touch all of its aspects. ... Its major themes, like the shooting sequence and the identification of the conspirators are not well constructed and some of his conclusions are not supported by the latest findings. And his criticism of Jim Garrison was unfortunate and unjustifiable. After finishing the book you are left with the impression that it was probably written in the 90s and not in 2013, writes Vasilios Vazakas.

David Joseph reviews in detail the evidence for Oswald's alleged trip to Mexico City – Part 2.

Investigators say files could prove interference

by Brian Bender, At:  The Boston Globe

David Joseph reviews in detail the evidence for Oswald's alleged trip to Mexico City – Part 1.

by Wynne Johnson

At:  Vimeo

A valuable Big Picture book, one with many new sources for study, which bring in much fascinating information. The light [Swanson] sheds on men like Nitze and Acheson show just what hollow clowns the so-called Wise Men of the media really were. [The book] also demonstrates just how powerful and dangerous the Military Industrial Complex has become. By showing Kennedy's opposition to it, he may have also shown why Kennedy was killed, concludes Jim DiEugenio.

Jim DiEugenio presents in five parts why, 50 years on, the Warren Report can no longer be taken seriously.

Hasan Yusuf reviews DPD Sergeant Gerald Hill's activities on November 22, 1963 and their implications for complicity in Lee Harvey Oswald's being charged with the Tippit murder.

I didn't agree with John and Mike on every issue. But most of the time they were on the right track. Beyond that, they provided a serious and credible counterweight to the nonsense of the dying MSM.  We are all a bit poorer with their leaving us, writes Jim DiEugenio.