Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

The civil rights movement was led by remarkable individuals like Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, and more. Most of these leaders, including King, were “dispatched” because they tried to change the status quo.

Behind the scenes, the King faced a formidable adversary in the form of J. Edgar Hoover, the controversial FBI director. Hoover's obsession with King is a dark chapter in American history, highlighting the extent to which government agencies can misuse their authority. Click here for more on this.

Let’s reexamine the complex relationship between J. Edgar Hoover and MLK.

Guilt by Association

Hoover's obsession with King began with a disturbing strategy: Guilt by association. Despite the absence of evidence linking King to the Communist Party, Hoover sought to tarnish King's reputation by connecting him to leftist and communist organizations. This tactic aimed to undermine King's credibility and harm the civil rights movement.

For example, after King was stabbed during a 1958 book signing in New York City, the FBI noted that one of his blood donors, Benjamin Davis, was a Communist Party member. The Bureau also highlighted King's name on a petition for clemency for a man imprisoned for not wanting to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). This guilt-by-association strategy aimed to smear King's name.

Surveillance and Intrusion

J. Edgar Hoover, in true FBI fashion, ordered the surveillance of King’s activities. The FBI had been tapping King's phone in Atlanta since the late 1950s, long before any concrete evidence of wrongdoing emerged. The intrusion into King's privacy violated his civil liberties and raised concerns about government overreach.

As if that wasn’t enough, the FBI “investigated” the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) offices to gather information on King. This pattern of surveillance and intrusion intensified as Hoover's fixation grew.

MLK during a march

Direct Conflict and Smear Campaigns

The conflict between J. Edgar Hoover and MLK escalated when the latter wrote an article for The Nation, advocating for greater FBI involvement in combating civil rights violations in the South. King also pointed out the lack of agents of color within the FBI, suggesting that this might hinder their commitment to civil rights causes. Hoover responded by questioning why King had not been investigated by the FBI and underlined this in a memo.

Hoover's main charges against King were rooted in accusations that two of King's supporters, Stanley Levison and Jack O'Dell, had communist affiliations. Despite the lack of concrete evidence, Hoover spread these rumors to politicians on Capitol Hill, creating a cloud of suspicion around King's associates.

Where Does the US Stand Today?

We live in a capitalist society. If anything, the elites that remained untouchable back then have only brought more social classes into their fold.

The purpose of revisiting this dark period in history underscores the importance of safeguarding civil liberties and ensuring transparency and accountability without exception. It reminds us of the need to protect individuals who champion social justice, even in the face of powerful opposition.

An alleged target of that opposition, Martin Luther King, is the victim of one of the most mysterious political assassinations of the 1960s. Dissect these mysteries by checking out the MLK assassination tab.

Get in touch for comments and feedback about our most recent article.

President John F. Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy After Landing in Dallas, TX

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

Joe Carter is a former reporter for United Press International. He was on the scene during that tragic day when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas.

While he was someone who was there from the beginning to the unfortunate end, his support for the findings of Warren Commission and dismissal of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cast his testimony regarding the JFK assassination in doubt.

Tap here to know the main narrative regarding RFK Jr. that Joe Carter recently supported.

Keep reading to know what the presidential nominee said about his uncle’s assassination and Carter’s problematic response.

RFK Jr. Triggers All the Wrong Memories for Joe Carter

On 25th July 2023, in a heavily criticized interview with Fox News, Bobby Kennedy said there had been a concealment of facts spanning six decades regarding the JFK assassination.

He pointed out the Warren Commission's connection to Allen Dulles, who had held the position of the CIA head and was dismissed by his uncle at the time of the latter’s assassination.

Robert Kennedy Jr. also said he believed President Kennedy’s death was the result of a deliberate scheme and a conspiracy involving multiple individuals.

Joe Carter’s Response to the Assertions

A week later, Carter responded to Kennedy’s claims, saying they had triggered nightmares from that fateful day. His denouncement was reported in an extremely biased news report by The Norman Transcript, an outlet few are familiar with, for all the right reasons.

We at Kennedys and King wholeheartedly extend our well-wishes to the former reporter and hope that he feels better in the months following Kennedy’s statement. What we can’t support is his often-unreasonable support for the main narrative.

JFK in 1962

The Problem with Joe Carter’s JFK Assassination Narrative

In the same report, Carter mentions that he doesn’t buy the idea that the intelligence community was somehow involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy because, wait for it, “It always came back to Lee Harvey Oswald.”

The former journalist said that Oswald worked a job where he was in shooting range of the President’s motorcade, and he took it. He didn’t mention the finger and palm prints that were provided as evidence of Oswald’s alleged crime, and for good reason.

You see, there is no proof tying Oswald to the JFK assassination because the Warren Commission has itself debunked Oswald’s presence on the easternmost window from where the shots were said to have been fired.

It acknowledged that the key box and a nearby box at the window where the shots were fired did not bear Oswald's identifiable prints. Moreover, the prints found on one box were not conclusive evidence of when Oswald had touched it. Additionally, FBI expert Sebastian Latona found no latent prints on the paper bag during his initial examination on 23rd November 1963.

Help Us Get to the Truth Behind the JFK Assassination

If there is evidence tying Oswald to the JFK assassination, there is also enough reasonable doubt and contradictory evidence for the issue not to be “black and white,” as Joe Carter puts it.

Read our articles to support our efforts to denounce the main narrative and call out attempts to hide the truth behind JFK assassination. You could also contribute to our ongoing endeavors via multimedia or by raising your voice.

Get in touch for inquiries and comments.

President Harry Truman, Whose Administration Was the First to Show Interest in the Vietnam War

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

Certain events are so impactful that they define the period they occur in and reverberate for years to come. Events like the disclosure of the Pentagon Papers have the power to challenge a society's ideals, actions, and philosophies. Click here to learn more about the person responsible for bringing them into the public eye.

Today’s blog will introduce you to the significance of the Pentagon Papers and how they flipped public opinion about the Vietnam War on its head.

What Were the Pentagon Papers?

The Pentagon Papers were a study regarding our country’s political and military involvement in the Vietnam War between 1945–1967.

Commissioned by the US Department of Defense, these top-secret Papers were brought to light in March 1971 by Daniel Ellsberg, a defense analyst who risked his safety and career by making copies of the report and disseminating it to several news publications.

These classified documents unearthed a trail of decisions, strategies, and motivations that had steered the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War for decades.

Did the Papers Meet Their Goals?

The then-Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, commissioned the Pentagon Papers to analyze America’s role in the Saigon conflict. The report was meant to trace back the decisions and policies that led to the divisive public image of the conflict. However, it only ended up unraveling a tale of concealment and manipulation.

The 7000-page report traced our country’s journey through the war. The internal analysis included incriminating facts about the half-truths and misinformation campaigns that administrations had spun to keep the public on their side.

From President Truman first dipping his toes in Saigon to President Johnson declaring a complete escalation, the Papers confirmed what the critics were saying: A systemic effort was at play to manipulate public opinion to continue military operations that lost their moral foundation the second they resulted in civilian casualties.

Nixon and South Vietnamese President


The Enduring Legacy of the Pentagon Papers

Defense analyst Daniel Ellsberg’s courage and perseverance led to the publication of the Papers in the New York Times, The Washington Post, and many other newspapers.

The reveal marked a watershed moment in American history, shaking the public’s faith in their leaders and the institutions they governed. The anti-war sentiments were no more divisive but an eye-opener for those who favored military involvement in Vietnam.

It’s been over half a century since these Papers were published. Still, its echoes remain in the form of the accountability and transparency we continue to demand from those who we choose to represent our principles and politics.

Learn More About the Biggest Coverups in US History

By leaving no stone unturned regarding the Vietnam War, the Pentagon Papers shed light on other scandals, forcing people to second-guess official accounts whether or not they were the truth.

The assassination of John F. Kennedy is one such scandal whose official account and alleged killer Lee Harvey Oswald has been debunked several times. Follow our platform as we stick to the facts in our struggle to bring the truth behind the JFK assassination to light.

Support our platform so that we may continue fighting the good fight.

President John F. Kennedy with the US Air Force General Curtis LeMay

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

The Useful Idiots podcast lived up to the second half of its name on its June 23 episode hosted by Aaron Mate and Katie Helper. The episode also featured guests Aaron Good, host of the podcast American Exception and author of the same-name book, and David Talbot, a famous author and journalist.

Click here to read our critique of the opinions shared by the guests. Alternatively, continue reading for a snapshot of Aaron Mate’s problematic statements regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Mate’s Reading List: Sy Hersh and Noam Chomsky

Aaron Mate is not just an ordinary podcaster fascinated with the JFK assassination and our country’s murky 1960s in general. He’s a respected journalist and writer from Canada who had Kennedys and King’s respect right up until he said the following individuals informed his theories and opinions:

  • Seymour Hersh of the recent Nord Stream “scoop.”
  • Noam Chomsky, who’s convinced that the Warren Commission’s findings are the be-all and end-all of the JFK assassination.

As you’ll see, Mate’s misinformed reliance on these two individuals results in some of the falsest claims we’ve heard regarding the events surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

 Vietnam War scenes

Mate’s Statements About the National Security Action Memoranda 263

For those who don’t know, the National Security Action Memoranda 263, or NSAM, was an important document issued by President Kennedy on October 11, 1963. It announced a shift in the US military presence in Vietnam, ordering the withdrawal of 1,000 personnel by the end of 1963.

In that unfortunate Useful Idiots episode, Aaron Mate supports Chomsky’s theory that this withdrawal had a catch: The 1,000 advisors would only withdraw if Saigon had the upper hand. This idea incorrectly suggests that Kennedy would’ve reversed the policy had he lived long enough to see the reverse happen.

Chomsky’s theory falls flat once you reread the NSAM. It stresses the importance of training and preparing the South Vietnamese military to fight and defend their land against the North-endorsed Viet Cong insurgence. Kennedy wouldn’t have made such a statement if he wanted his military to stay in South Vietnam.

Mate’s Support for a Debunked Chomsky Theory

Our knowledge of the JFK assassination changes with each declassification. However, it seems Aaron Mate is content to support an outdated theory from a book written before the Assassination Records Review Board findings went public with the documents related to the Vietnam War.

The documents contained the phased exit strategy of the US troops from Vietnam, which was to be completed by 1965. The documents indicate an unconditional withdrawal, with no hint of an escalation if the tide turned against South Vietnam.

Explore Possible Motives Behind the JFK Assassination Online

President Kennedy accepted that his military’s efforts in South Vietnam were largely futile. No stipulations or conditions were attached to his exit strategy and no ifs and/or buts regarding his final orders regarding the Vietnam War.

The same cannot be said for his assassination, which remains the largest cover-up in the history of American politics. Learn what you can do to disclose the truth behind the JFK assassination.

Please contribute to our platform to help us continue our tireless efforts in bringing the truth to light.

Candles Being Lit Inside a Cathedral, Illustrating the Somberness of Christine King Farris’s Passing

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

While we are familiar with the towering figure of Dr. Martin Luther King and the crucial contributions of Coretta Scott King, it is equally important to remember the lesser-known yet equally influential members of the King family.

Christine King Farris was the first King sibling born and the last to pass on. A teacher and life-long civil rights activist, she died on June 29, 2023, at 95. Below is a snippet of her life and legacy.

From Violent Beginnings

Christine King Farris was born on September 11, 1927, in the heart of Atlanta, Georgia. As the eldest sibling of the King family, she experienced racial segregation and injustice from the time she could remember.

Growing up amidst these challenges, she and her siblings were instilled with a profound sense of purpose and a belief that they could change the world.

Like her brother Martin, Christine was profoundly influenced by their father, Martin Luther King Sr., a Baptist pastor. Their family's faith transcended the walls of their church and became the driving force behind their activism. From an early age, Christine joined her brother and sister in tireless efforts to dismantle systemic racism in America.

A Lifelong Champion of Justice

As the civil rights movement gained momentum, Christine King Farris remained a steadfast advocate for justice.

She was vital in organizing and participating in various civil rights endeavors alongside her siblings, especially the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).

 Martin Luther King, Coretta Scott King, Dr. Ralph David Abernathy, and His wife Mrs. Juanita Abernathy Leading a March in 1965

An Inspirational Educator

Christine's contributions extended far beyond the public eye. She was a devoted educator, sharing her wisdom at Spelman College in Atlanta.

There, she inspired countless young minds and emphasized the transformative power of education as a tool for empowerment and societal change. Her commitment to education and civil rights created a profound legacy that continues to influence generations.

Notable Contributions

As the last surviving sibling of the King family, Christine King Farris assumed a unique role in safeguarding her family's legacy. She penned several books, including Through It All: Reflections on My Life, My Family, and My Faith, offering a deeply personal window into her life and the impactful journey of her family.

Through her writings and public appearances, she ensured that the world would always remember the story of the King family and their invaluable contributions.

Christine also advocated for preserving the Martin Luther King Jr. National Historic Site. Her pivotal role in its establishment secured the historical significance of her family's contributions to the civil rights movement, ensuring their story would be shared with the world for generations.

Be the Torchbearers for Justice with Kennedys and King

Christine was the torchbearer of civil rights for her family and community, just like her family before her. Now that the last of that generation has passed on, we must carry it forward, starting with advocating for the truth behind the Martin Luther King assassinationartin Luther King assassination. Contribute to our efforts through multimedia or by spreading the word.

Contact us for more information and inquiries.

Find Us On ...


Please publish modules in offcanvas position.